"
In "Are Prisons Obsolete?" , Angela Davis—a scholar, activist, and figurehead of the Black and feminist movements—critically examines the concept of incarceration as punishment in the country with the largest prison population in the world. Addressing the American past, the author points out how prisons, since their emergence in the country's penal landscape, have reproduced the slavery-based mindset that prevailed until abolition.
These structures of power and privilege, rooted in racism and sexism, have continued to this day, where a stint in prison seems to have become inevitable in the lives of the poor and minorities, criminalized by their very existence, for belonging to an undesirable segment of the population.
Since the 1980s, prison construction and incarceration rates in the United States have grown exponentially, sparking significant public concern about the proliferation, privatization, and promise of massive profits from the prison system. However, these prisons house disproportionate numbers of ethnic minorities, revealing the system's entrenched racism.
It takes more than reforming the prison system to create less inhumane conditions—it's also necessary to seek alternatives to incarceration as a tool for criminal reform. And in this sense, it's impossible not to see the parallels between the anti-prison movement and the abolitionist movement: with this last great abolition of American life, we can finally begin to dismantle the structures that condemn so many to a life of misery and suffering.
In Are Prisons Obsolete?, renowned activist Angela Davis clearly exposes the problems of the current prison system and proposes a radical transformation in the way society thinks about punishment: it is necessary to recognize that punishment “is not a consequence of crime in the simple, logical sequence offered by discourses that insist on the justice of imprisonment, but rather that punishment—primarily through incarceration (and sometimes death)—is linked to political projects, to corporations' desire for profit, and to media representations of crime.”
"
